March 2009
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Personal Beliefs - the “God Bias”

Zephyrus and Hyacinthos. Attic red-figured cup...Image via Wikipedia

The “god bias” is another topic from my personal beliefs.  I am a gay Atheist and a Scientist (analytical chemistry PhD grad student). As a result, I have found the “god bias” to have a few weak points.  I have also found that this bias is detrimental to scientific progress and, hence, human progress.  In this post I will attempt to demonstrate why I have this belief and how it is based on actual facts (not blind faith).

True, being gay does turn a person off from the whole “god” thing to begin with.  Even thought the Word of God does not treat homosexuality with any more enmity than theft, lying, or adultery, “christians” have a tendency to over play the “god” card on this lifestyle.  Let me be very clear on the subject.  Homosexuality is only condemned in the Bible three times (Lev 18:22, Lev 20:13, and 1st Cor 6:9).  But sexual immorality is much more broadly covered by the Word of God and it includes every heterosexual act imaginable (read Lev 18 and Lev 20).  So from the very beginning, anyone with the “god bias” specifically against homosexuality is mistaken.  YHWH despises all of humankind’s sexual acts, equally.

But there is so much more to the “god bias”.  This bias brings us concepts like: YHWH is Love, YHWH is mysterious, and YHWH created the world in seven days.  I can erase the YHWH is Love concept with two verses:

Ex 34:14 Do not worship any other god, for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God.

1st Cor 13:4-7 Love is patient, love is kind.  If does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud.  It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs.  Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth.  It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.

Now if those two verses do not completely wipe the “god bias” YHWH is Love off the table, someone is living in an imaginary world.  Is it not completely obvious that YHWH is not Love?

What about YHWH being mysterious?  He certainly was not to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, or Joseph.  Do I even need to make references to when YHWH spoke directly each of these Patriarchs?  If you need help with that just read the Book of Genesis starting in chapter 15.  YHWH was not mysterious to a single prophet throughout the OT.  I certainly won’t make references to those stories, if you need help understanding that YHWH is not mysterious read about Moses, the Egyptian plagues, the book of Deuteronomy, both Samuels, Nehemiah, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel or any of the minor prophets.  YHWH was not mysterious in the OT, why would he be mysterious today?  Unless, we are talking about two separate beings!

Now let me get to the fun one.  How did YHWH create the world (universe) in seven days?  He didn’t.  First, notice that in Gen 1:14 YHWH created the sun after the earth.  That was the 4th “day” without a sun the earth could not revolve around anything.  Time was completely arbitrary until the sun actually moved across the sky.  And we know that:

2nd Peter 3:8 But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day.

Psalms 90:4 also agrees with this verse.  There are other reasons why the creation of the earth did not have to take place in 7 days: the word “yowm” has more than the 24 hour definition (accuracy in Genesis).  So simply put the “god bias” that YHWH created the world in seven days is actually fictitious.

Those are the weak points in the “god bias” but what about how detrimental this bias is to both science and human progress?  I will use historical examples to show that the “god bias” has been detrimental to science.  Let’s start with Galileo.  He was excommunicated (soulforce.org) and not allowed to publish his works (goArticles.com) because they went against the teachings of the “god bias” in his time.  This was the “god bias” attempting to stifle science.  Just think what would have happened if they had been successful?  Would we have landed on the Moon?  Would we even know to be actively looking for meteors/asteroid that could hit the earth?  The “god bias” continued to stifle scientific progress through the centuries and is still active today.  The Scopes Monkey Trial (Andy Bradbury) and the Dover School Trial (MSNBC) are modern day attempts where the “god bias” is actively to minimize or even harm scientific progress.  Bans on Stem Cell research (allaboutpopularissues.com) is the same case.  If scientist are not allowed to do the research, what harm may come to humanity.  Evolution is helping us understand not just how life evolved; it helps with understanding how pathogens (Arizona State University) and cancer (Dan at Migrations) can be controlled.

By serendipity that link on the excommunication of Galileo brings up another strong point against “god bias”.  The “god bias” allowed slavery of centuries, yet today we know that slavery is a heinous crime against humanity. 

I want to finish with what I feel is the strongest case against the “god bias”.  The concept that “God did it” ends all questions.  No more searching is required for the answer to the problem.  What if humankind had stopped at “Lighting – god did it” or “Earthquakes – god did it”.  We would be living in daily fear of lightning strikes and earthquakes.  The same goes for childhood disease like polio, measles, and diphtheria.  Childhood vaccinations (familydoctor.org) are not perfect but they are responsible for a childhood survival rates improving (worldvision.org).  What would the outcome be if we had left children dying of preventable diseases just because of “God wants it this way”?  How much suffering would occur in the world today?  Not just the children who would be in agony, but what about the cost of medical care required to ease their pains as they die?  What about the suffering that the parents would endure as they watch their child die?

So you can at least see why I have a personal belief that the “god bias” is harmful to human society.  There are more examples of the harm “god bias” does, but I will end with the ones I have already covered: inequality for minorities, false beliefs about YHWH, scientific censorship, and the complete stifling of science.  All of these examples, and more, are proof that the “god bias” is unacceptable behavior for our society.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

11 Responses to “Personal Beliefs - the “God Bias””

  1. Ask the leadership coach » Dear Canonist » Blog Archive » Personal Beliefs - the “God Bias” says:

    […] Renee E posted a noteworthy aricle today onHere’s a small snippetThe “god bias” is another topic from my personal beliefs. I am a gay Atheist and a Scientist (analytical chemistry PhD grad student). As a result, I have found the “god bias” to have a few weak points. I have also found that this bias … […]

  2. Kay says:

    Thankyou for expressing your views so honestly. Your perspective is from your background which is both “West” and “ex-christian”. Not all who have a “God-bias” are culturally “western” or of a christian background—-there are many religions in the world—most of them very compatible with science. As to “human progress”, in the east this could be understood as spiritual progress and “wisdom”(religion/philosophy) plays an important role. Nevertheless, your views are an important comment about your society and I appreciate that you so generously shared them. I hope you continue to do so.

  3. dc-agape says:

    Kay,
    You are very right about both your points.

    I do attemt to remind my readers that this is not even “Western” culture, but US American religious culture.

    I also would not mind religion/philosophy/wisdom, if (in the US) it did not require the dichotomy of my last point. Here in the US you are either a scientist (materialist) or you are a Christian (spiritual).

    The “us vs them” attitude is harmful to society. Yet the US Christians cannot and will not allow for the “middle ground”. As a result, US Atheists (and many Western Atheists) do not have the freedom to ignore such vapid religiousity.

  4. anime lesbo rape says:

    hmm. love it :)

  5. Chicas Desnudas Galerias says:

    any news coming ?

  6. imagenes de ninas desnudas says:

    emm. informative.

  7. Tina Pee Squad says:

    now I’ll stay tuned..

  8. Stacy says:

    Sometimes u need to be strict with children, but that doesnt mean you should hit them. Being strict and hitting children are two different things. What hitting does is makes the child more stubborn. Many a times, we hit a child not coz of his fault but coz we are frustrated about something else in our life. That is very unfair. Would we have liked something similar to be done to us when we were a child? Even if we have gone through it in our childhood, it does not give us any reason to do the same to the little budding flowers. Keep calm, give them love and they will be just fine and listen to you even more.

  9. Private Geschichten says:

    i’m gonna make my own post about it

  10. Orange County Home Theater says:

    I was installing some speakers today and the customer was talking to me about this exact thing. They used to record live productions and he had a lot of interesting experiences and asked a lot of questions, but in the end it was a good day afterall.

Leave a Reply