More Traditions of Men

October 5, 2009, 7:05 pm by dc-agape.

John Chapter 18

This is the chapter where Jesus is “betrayed”, Peter denies knowing Jesus, and Barabbas (an Israeli freedom fighter/terrorist) was set free.  Obviously, some of these things are questionable at best.  All three are veiled in Christian mysticism.  Of course, to the common believer all three of these events are completely logical, completely under YHWH control, and completely without question having occurred.  But is this true?

Let’s start with a “betrayal”.  Was it truly betrayal?  Jesus was certainly prepared for it.  Does that mean that there was a supernatural power behind the events?  Or does Occam’s razor come into play?  For Jesus to know what was going to happen the easiest and simplest explanation was that Judas and Jesus had easily planned this.  The olive garden (”because Jesus had often met there with his disciples”) was actually not used very often.  Using all four Gospels, Jesus was rarely in Jerusalem.  Only the Gospel of John does Jesus into Jerusalem more than once.  His last stay only lasted six day (John 12:1).  And not once did the disciples go to the Mount of Olives during this period of time.  So the verse that says:

John 18:2 Now Judas, who betrayed him, knew the place, because Jesus had also met there with his disciples.

Nowhere in the Gospels does it describe Jesus using the Mount of Olives as a common location for Jesus’ teachings.  Adding to that six days does not single out a single location, unmentioned in the gospels, as a place where Judas could be certain that Jesus would be.  The only way Judas could know this was if Jesus had told him to meet him there.  Jesus certainly had everything under control, because he planned it that way.  No supernatural control was needed.  The other option is that Judas had no freewill.

More interestingly, is the case of Peter fulfilling Jesus’ prophecy of his denial.  For Jesus to get that right down to the exact moment:

John 18:27 Again he denied it, and at that moment a rooster began to grow.

This would imply that Jesus certainly knew to the finest detail what Peter would do (the rooster crowing as Peter denied knowing Jesus).  If we take this passage literally, then as I’ve said before, Peter did not have freewill.  This would mean that YHWH can and does remove freewill arbitrarily.  As a result, we pour humans can never tell whether we’re acting under our own freewill or being forced by a supreme being.  Anything that I do, saying, or believe is subjects to the arbitrary decision of YHWH to interfere.  Saying that YHWH can but doesn’t, does not solve the fact that at any arbitrary moment YHWH to interfere at his whim.

The story of Barabbas adds another interesting twist to this chapter.  No other document, Roman or Israeli, mentions the name Barabbas.  To make matters worse, no documents, Roman or Israeli, even mentions that Pilate ever offered the Jews the opportunity to release a prisoner at the Passover.  Both of these cases make the story of the release of Barabbas questionable.  Was even more detrimental to this story is what the Gospels claim about Barabbas.  If he truly was an instigator and a murderer, he was certainly a Zionist.  Pilate, as the highest ranking Roman in Jerusalem, would never free such a man.  When you add all these historical perspectives, this passage (recorded in all four Gospels) begins to look very pale to say the least.  The other option is that Pilate had no freewill.

To the non-believer, this chapter implies three things: a different relationship between Jesus and Judas that the Traditions of Men have implied, the lack of freewill that the Traditions of Men imply, and the questionability of the legitimacy of the Gospels.  Again, I will last a simple question: why are there so many Traditions of Men included into the Word of God?  These incidences of questionable interpretation put a cloud of doubt over the entire Bible.

Posted in Gospel of John, Traditions of Men, Freewill, Readings | Print | 6 Comments »